Updated Feb 14, 2025
Comparing Voice AI Models: ElevenLabs vs. Narakeet
Comparing Voice AI Models: ElevenLabs vs. Narakeet. Discover the strengths of each platform in voice generation and cloning.
Comparing Voice AI Models: ElevenLabs vs. Narakeet
Eleven Labs offers highly natural, emotional voices with extensive customization but comes at a premium price. Narakeet provides good quality, cost-effective voices ideal for business content, though less expressive.
Look for a ElevenLabs and Narakeet Alternatives?
Voice Clone with 3s of Audio
Cartesia's voice cloning can create high-quality clones in just 3 seconds.
Ultra-Realistic Voices
Experience lifelike voice replication with Cartesia's advanced embedding technology.
Ultra-Realistic Voices
Cartesia's voices are nearly indistinguishable from human speech, ensuring natural interactions.
Enterprise Ready
Enterprise-grade reliability with 99.9% uptime, SOC2 compliance, and full on-premises support.
How they stack up
Voice Quality Comparison
When evaluating voice quality, ElevenLabs stands out with a WER of 2.83%, showcasing its ability to produce clear and coherent speech. In contrast, Narakeet's specific metrics are less documented, making it difficult to assess its performance directly. ElevenLabs achieves high speech naturalness in 44.98% of cases, indicating a more human-like quality in its generated voices. This suggests that ElevenLabs may be the preferred choice for applications requiring high-quality voice output, while Narakeet's performance remains less transparent.
Latency Assessment
In our latency evaluation, we measured the Time to First Audio (TTFA) for both ElevenLabs and Narakeet. ElevenLabs demonstrated impressive responsiveness, with a 90th percentile TTFA score that indicates quick audio generation. Narakeet's latency metrics are less clearly defined, making it challenging to provide a direct comparison. However, ElevenLabs' ability to deliver audio swiftly positions it as a strong contender for applications requiring real-time voice generation, while Narakeet's performance in this area remains uncertain.
Hallucination Rate Analysis
The hallucination rate is a critical factor in evaluating voice AI models. ElevenLabs shows a low hallucination rate, with a WER of 2.83%, suggesting that it generates accurate and contextually relevant speech. Narakeet's specific hallucination metrics are not readily available, making it difficult to draw direct comparisons. This indicates that ElevenLabs may be more reliable in producing coherent speech without introducing inaccuracies, while Narakeet's performance in this regard is less defined.
Voice Cloning
In this evaluation, we compare the voice cloning capabilities of ElevenLabs and Narakeet. ElevenLabs boasts a Word Error Rate (WER) of 2.83%, indicating high accuracy in speech generation. In contrast, Narakeet's performance metrics are not as widely published, making direct comparisons challenging. ElevenLabs also excels in pronunciation accuracy, achieving high scores in 81.97% of cases. This suggests that ElevenLabs may provide a more lifelike and accurate voice cloning experience, while Narakeet's capabilities remain less defined in the current landscape.
Voice Design Control
In assessing voice design controllability, ElevenLabs offers a range of customization options, allowing users to fine-tune voice characteristics effectively. With a high pronunciation accuracy of 81.97%, it enables precise control over voice output. Narakeet's capabilities in voice design are less documented, making it challenging to evaluate its flexibility. This suggests that ElevenLabs may provide a more robust platform for users seeking to tailor voice outputs to specific needs, while Narakeet's offerings in this area remain less clear.
Pricing Comparison: ElevenLabs vs. Narakeet Plans
Trusted by leading enterprises. Speaking from experience.
Discover success stories

“Cartesia Sonic 3.5 has become one of the top-performing models for us by combining low latency with natural pacing… helping us deliver strong voice quality across a growing set of languages where other models often fall short.”
Lydia Zarcone
Voice Product Manager
“We didn’t switch to Sonic 3.5 because it was incrementally better, we switched because nothing else came close… we’ve seen a 2.9% lift in our conversion and a 12.2% increase in customer engagement.”
Akshay Ramaswamy
Staff Product Manager
Frequently asked questions
Capabilities